Brazil for a fair, democratic and ecologically sustainable: If environmental sustainability is not included Brazil not out of the crisis and not returned to grow

About the prospect of an archaic nationalist developmental project, the works party PT and some other organizations formulate proposals to exit the current crisis, returning to blame the big banks and the crisis investment funds, this text states that the resignation of PT their environmental flags nineties, the struggle for agrarian reform, protection of indigenous lands, the ecoindustrial conversion among other environmental flags, and the failure to include the vision of sustainable development in public policies of recent years have led the PT to a form of rule totally away from their original ideas, only the resumption of this program may for the PT and other parties on the way to resolving the structural crisis that suffers Brazil.

The PT can not accuse the real sector of wanting to capture the state, as he opened the fair contracts for digging contractors in support of agriculture, livestock, petroleum, construction, automotive sector and the banks themselves and thus be able to govern with bribes and payments to political, social policy PT dug up on buying support bought with dirty money.

For this, the PT gave up all environmental policy allowing destructive agriculture of agricultural goods, livestock expansion from tribal areas and the Amazon rainforest, increasing consumption of oil and gas and leaving aside the wind and solar power, favoring pharaonic building civil works like hydroelectric dams, railroads and highways, refusing to levy taxes to the automotive sector so contributing to the car's expansion in the country deepened the climate crisis, destroying the public and collective transport.

All this with the argument that they were protecting the employment of the population, but jeopardizing long-term environmental sustainability of Brazil, the population receives wages but have no access to clean water, food and clean energy, the government takes with the foot who gave to the hand shape, but perverse possible, one must phone but do not have clean water. The populist programs of minimum income created a perverse cycle of increase in the size of families, but without giving definitive outputs informality, underemployment and lack of access to health services, education and security.

It is clear that opposition to PT also does not have a sustainable development project for Brazil, it puts forward company with a dilemma type ! Now running the beast catches! If you stay the beast eats !, the third way that would be represented by Marina Silva and a group of social organizations fail to earn enough visibility for the complex characteristics of the crisis that make it difficult to understand the population, everyone believed that mobile access, cable television and internet would be an improvement in quality of life, but it did not come accompanied by access to water, food, housing and land worth keeping at the end of the exclusion conditions.